Man Ke Darpan Main - Om the Fusion Band

Man ke darpan main dakhe hai kitne rang jivan ke
Man ke darpan main dakhe hai kitne rang jivan ke

saat sur milke jaise sangeet main dhale,
phool chunchun ke jaise gulshan koi khile.

Man ke darpan main dakhe hai kitne rang jivan ke

pal main badal hai, pal main kirne hai,
bhor hai, sanjh hai kabhi.
ek pal man nirash hai, aas hai kabhi.
pal main muskan, pal main hairaan,
pray hai, bair hai kabhi.
log apne hai ek pal, gair hai kabhi.
pal ye kab jane din bane, jane kaise din badle sal main
ungloin par gine agar yu to sal bhi guzra hai kai
pachi mudh ke jo dakhe ek bar aaj bhi yaad hai sabhi
yaadion ke saath khaboon ke silsile chale
beete har pal ke rang, har khab main mile.

Man ke darpan main dakhe hai kitne rang jivan ke
Man ke darpan main dakhe hai kitne rang jivan ke

din ladkhpan ke, manchale pan ke kitne masoom the sabhi
aab hai aphsos lot ke aayege nahi,
pal do pal ke hai sare ehsas, pal do pal ki hai zindagi.
rishte nate bhi khel hai pal do pal ke he.
bahti nadya ki dhar ke jaisi har kushi aani jani hai,
sase jab tak chal rahi dharkno main jab tak ravani hai.
ek roshan diye ki lo jaise zindagi ki khani hai
andhiyo main bhi zindagi ki ye lo jale
sas ki lo per umar ki gastan chale

Quotes

Every cloud has a silver linning, the challenge is to find it.
--Unknown Author

How lucky I am to have something that makes saying goodbye so hard.
--From the movie Annie

am waiting for some action to be taken!!!

Arjun has no sympathy for OBCs: He is playing crass politics via www.samachar.com

Different Backward Class Commissions have given varying figures. The latest figures claim 52 percent of India’s population as being OBC. It was spread among 3743 different castes. Putting them all together in one OBC category is ridiculous. The powerful Yadavas have hogged most of the reservation benefits for OBCs.

Even among Dalits the powerful Chamars have done likewise. Dividing OBCs into Most Backward Castes (MBC) and Extreme Backward Castes (EBC) does not help. There are too many castes to ensure equitable reservation, on a caste basis, for all the castes.

What is the objection to well defined economic and social criteria to determine reservation? Only one objection comes to mind. Pro-reservationists might claim this would result in partial selection because of forward caste bias.

There is a simple solution to this. Let all selection boards have reservation. Ninety percent of board members could be Dalit, OBC and Minority. That would allow affirmative action without accentuating caste in society.

To establish a genuine level playing field would require compulsory standardized government-run neighborhood schools throughout the nation. Even if the entire budget outlay for education were spent on implementing this the results would justify the investment.

Other ideas to ensure effective affirmative action for circumventing caste could be considered, but it would be pointless. It is the politics of caste that motivates politicians to support caste-based reservation.

Fanaa

I would have seen the movie anyway ... But just to protest I want to go to Gujarat n see the movie. Sometime I wonder are we truly living in democracy????

I wish i could contribute... (guilt is sinking in)

Faculty members on leave; JNU,IIT students begin hunger strike from The Hindu

After rejecting the Government proposal, medicos today stepped up their anti-reservation stir with faculty members of three premier hospitals going on mass casual leave and the medical fraternity gearing up for a total shutdown on Wednesday.

The striking medicos got a boost, as students of the prestigious Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) and Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Delhi began a relay hunger strike at their campuses to express solidarity with them.

Marriage n scientific careers....

Scientific Success: WhatÂ’s Love Got to Do With It? from http://sciencecareers.org

"The productivity of male scientists tends to drop right after marriage," says Kanazawa in an e-mail interview from his current office at the London School of Economics and Political Science in the United Kingdom. "Scientists tend to 'desist' from scientific research upon marriage, just like criminals desist from crime upon marriage."

Kanazawa's perhaps controversial perspective is that of an evolutionary psychologist. "Men conduct scientific research (or do anything else) in order to attract women and get married (albeit unconsciously)," he says. "What’s the point of doing science (or anything else) if one is already married? Marriage (or, more accurately reproductive success, which men can usually attain only through marriage) is the goal; science or anything else men do is but a means. From my perspective, scientists are no different than anybody else; evolutionary psychology applies to all humans equally," he adds.

and there is much more that it says not just this aspect.

The Dilemma

To laugh is to risk appearing a fool.
To weep is to risk appearing sentimental.
To reach out for another is to risk involvement.
To expose feelings is to risk rejection.
To place your dreams before the crowd is to risk ridicule.
To love is to risk not being loved in return.
To go forward in the face of overwhelming odds is to risk failure.

But risks must be taken because the greatest hazard in life is to risk nothing.
The person who risks nothing does nothing, has nothing, is nothing.
He may avoid suffering and sorrow, but he cannot learn, feel, change, grow or love.
Chained by his certitudes, he is a slave.
He has forfeited his freedom.
Only a person who takes risks is free.

--Janet Rand

Quotes

Courage is never to let your actions be influenced by your fears.
--Arthur Koestler


Optimism is the foundation of courage.
--Nicholas Murray Butler

Some how this article feels incomplete but it good read...

Seduced by an elusive idea of India from The Hindu

People may no longer ask you if you have computers in India, but they still wonder whether there is clean drinking water and believe that India, despite its booming economy, remains a "terrible place to be poor," as New Statesman noted in a special issue on India recently. The magazine's South Asia correspondent William Dalrymple voiced concern over the "unevenness" of the boom India is experiencing and pointed out that "much of India remains completely untouched" by it. The jury on India's future was still out, he suggested.

"India is changing with a speed that is astonishing, but ... much still remains uncertain and the country remains as fascinatingly unpredictable as ever," he wrote.

Translated in blunt language, it means that the idea of a "new" and "prosperous" India poised to become a "modern" super power is slightly exaggerated. Eventually, India will be defined not by the swanky new neighbourhoods in Gurgaon but by its crushing poverty that makes the country seem like "one land, two planets," as a headline in the magazine put it.

And what about India's much talked-about "soft power" in this "new era"? Its capacity to influence the world culturally? There is a worry that far from being able to influence others, the country itself is in danger of descending into a cultural black hole. "India goes Bollywood" was the topic of a debate, held as part of the Bonn Biennale, to explore the impact of India's economic boom and increasing "commercialisation of society" on its media.

Is there a danger that artistes and journalists in India are becoming too dependent on market forces? How big is the space for non-commercial art? And to what extent is entertainment replacing serious information and debate?

These were the questions posed to a mixed Indo-German panel, which included Dorothee Wenner, head of programme at Internationale Filmfestspiele. Opinion, as happens on such occasions, was divided with at least one participant — an art consultant from India — strongly opposing the view that space for serious debate back home was shrinking and being taken over by commercial forces. But because there was no consensus does not mean that the issues surrounding the relationship of culture, media, and the market disappear. These are real concerns and, in fact, the debate that took place in Bonn should be happening in India.

Ask any dispassionate observer of the post-liberalisation "modern" India and the answer you are likely to get to the above questions is: yes, artistes and journalists are becoming too dependent on market forces; there is little space for non-commercial art; and serious debate is almost non-existent. In fact, "India goes Bollywood" is a very apt description for what is going on in India on the cultural front — and in much of the media, especially in electronic media, which was supposed to herald a brave new world of information.

Those of us who live abroad and "get" their India through private satellite TV channels (alas, Doordarshan remains curiously invisible) get the sense that culturally nothing is happening in India outside of Bollywood. Watching Indian TV channels is like watching a long Bollywood sequence, only occasionally interrupted by news or current affairs. Even news is not Bollywood-free. Clearly there is a perception in Indian TV newsrooms that the only way to spice up news and make it interesting is to pepper it with filmi stardust — Shah Rukh Khan endorsing a new computer brand; Preity Zinta opening a new jewellery boutique; Amitabh Bachchan on a visit to Dubai; Bobby Deol showing off his new restaurant.

In a sense, what is happening in the media, especially in television, is symptomatic of a wider indifference to ideas in India, whether in the academia or in cultural institutions. And this does not augur well for a country aspiring to become a super power even if only as a "new sort of super power," as New Statesman called it.

Quotes

They have stopped deceiving you, not loving you. And it seems to you that they have stopped loving you.
--Antonio Porchia, Voces, 1943, translated from Spanish by W.S. Merwin

He felt now that he was not simply close to her, but that he did not know where he ended and she began.
--Leo Tolstoy

Mary Magdalene -- interesting read

An Inconvenient Woman from MSNBC

She witnessed the resurrection, then vanished, leaving popes and painters and now 'The Da Vinci Code' to tell her story. In search of the real Mary Magdalene.

It is worth a read if you r interested in religious history and if u r a Christian and get offended by the 'The Da Vinci Code' then skip the first page.... But it is not about the that book it is in general about Mary Magdalene's character and the mystery around it due to the fact that she was a women.

One step ahead... but will it work?

Reservation — an alternative proposal from The Hindu

The proposal involves computing scores for `academic merit' and for `social disadvantage' and then combining the two for admission to higher educational institutions. Since the academic evaluation is less controversial, we concentrate here on the evaluation of comparative social disadvantage. We suggest that the social disadvantage score should be divided into its group and individual components. For the group component, we consider disadvantages based on caste and community, gender, and region. These scores must not be decided arbitrarily or merely on the basis of impressions. We suggest that these disadvantages should be calibrated on the basis of available statistics on representation in higher education of different castes/communities and regions, each of these being considered separately for males and females. The required data could come from the National Sample Survey or other available sources. It would be best, of course, if a special national survey were commissioned for this purpose.

Besides group disadvantages, this scheme also takes individual disadvantages into consideration. While a large number of factors determine individual disadvantages (family history, generational depth of literacy, sibling education, economic resources, etc.), we believe there are two robust indicators of individual disadvantage that can be operationally used in the system of admission to public institutions: parental occupation and the type of school where a person passed the high school examination. These two variables allow us to capture the effect of most of the individual disadvantages, including the family's educational history and economic circumstances.

Two more casulaties to the quota....

Two quit Knowledge Commission from The Hindu

Two members of the National Knowledge Commission, set up by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh last year, resigned on Monday in protest against the Centre's reservation policy.

While putting in their papers, sociologist Andre Beteille and political scientist Pratap Bhanu Mehta placed on record their support for affirmative action as opposed to numerical quotas.

The two were among the six in the eight-member Knowledge Commission who felt that the status quo ought to be maintained and the existing policy of reservation should not be extended to Other Backward Classes (OBCs) till alternatives were explored. The Commission formally discussed the reservation policy at a recent meeting in Bangalore and apprised the Prime Minister individually about their respective positions.

Dr. Beteille (Professor Emeritus of Sociology at the Delhi University) and Dr. Mehta (Chief Executive at the Centre for Policy Research) submitted their resignation letters to the Prime Minister stating that in the light of recent announcements by the Government in the realm of higher education, their continuation would serve no useful purpose.

Dr. Beteille told reporters later that he favoured affirmative action. "Though slow to bear fruit, affirmative action makes universities truly inclusive while quotas merely queer the pitch." He questioned the process by which the Government was imposing quotas on institutions such as the Indian Institutes of Technology without consulting their directors.

Quote

You have succeeded in life when all you really want is only what you really need.
--Vernon Howard

There is no Mandal II III or IV - Arjun Singh (so he says)

This entire weekend I have been flipping through news channels listening about the students' revolt against Mandal II... What started as a minor movement has slowly caught on and is due to become a nation wide revolt. And to some extent I would give full credit to the police for making this is nationwide event. Had they not done what they did to students in Delhi, Mumbai and Bangalore then probably this wouldn't be so hard fought by the students. There atrocities gave this Rang De Basanti generation another reason to come out on the streets and well why not. And so I say that let us thank the commissioner of police Bombay for his outrageous comments and then throw him out of his office.

Now let's look at the center of issue the reservation itself. Opinions flow from both ends in high passion on this issue. The people who favor this new (or the previous) reservation say that "It will give the traditionally underprivileged communities an opportunism to come at par with the rest of the society. Also that the underprivileged communities make a huge portion of the society and without there advancement we cannot make a progressive society."

My question to the government is what has it done in 55 yrs that these people have not been educated well enough that they cannot compete with the rest? Where has the money gone that was spent on education since independence? Why are these students not able to compete in the world today? Is because that they can't afford the expansive tuitions that is almost necessary for entrance exams? Or is it because that there basic foundation from the schools (government or private) is not strong enough? Is it because that these families do not give importance to education itself? Are backward classes the only once that suffer form these problems? Are there no others that will have the same problem? Why is the govt. signaling out the SC/ST? Is it because that they form the major vote banks? There are many question to be answered before we can actually there can be any appropriate solution.

None of the above is a fault is the fault of the student who will appear in the entrance exams... And then why does He/She have to pay for it? And most importantly reservation is a shortcut -- and some wise guy said that "there are no shortcuts to any place worth going" The uplifting of individual or a society is not done by giving them charity it is done by making them strong enough to be able to stand at par and with pride. Now lets look at the consequences of Mandal II(yes it is mandal II Mr Arjun Sing weather you accept it or not) Every deserving student that will loose out a seat to a non-deserving student will create a divide in the society that is already fighting many other such differences. Let us assume that we do not look at the intangible results but only at the tangible. Are we not pulling down the entire standard of education of some very good institutes? Are we not making the one strong selling point that India has (its educated youth) a lot weaker? Are we not passing out less competent workforce? Are we not increasing the already biased opinion about these communities? Are we not ruling by divide and conquer?

Now don't get me wrong I am not against uplifting of these sections of society it is jut that reservation is not the right way of doing it. If there ever has to reservation for anyone it has to be for economically backward. To bring them to the main stream we need to make them able and this is not done at university level it is done at lower levels, in schools. Open schools and make the education given there count. Follow through that programs that are implemented in villages to see that they reach there desired end. But no the government does not want to work all they want to do is find any number of way that will make others work and get them votes. Actually I can categorically say that Arjun Singh surely does not have the interest of the nation in his heart as he has a heart of politician.

Now let's look at the current situation… form the comments that have been delivered by our so called leaders of the society has been none other that Mr. Singh. This is a shameful act in itself. None of the politicians have cone out and made any comments including our revered PM. Shouldn't this be of some concern that the educated youth has taken to the streets, or is it because of the fact that the educated youth is still a small number vote that the politician do not concern themselves. Actually that is what is true. So for one thing we (this generation) should be aware of is that the more the number of people educated the better our voices will be heard. And second we need more educated people running this country, people who can think further than the next election. Mr Singh called the student movement 'propaganda' I call his move 'propaganda' because it truly benefits none.

One thing that does concern me is the suffering of the patients in the due course of the protest. We can put the blame on the govt. but the truth remains… they are suffering. So for protest let the medical students call upon some less fatal profession to conduct the strike. Let the MBA's, software professionals, industrialists', journalists' do that for them. Let the people not suffer in this fight for right with the government. Hopes are very limited, but the cause is worth a fight. But in the due process let us not forget that there are truly underprivileged people in our society and this fight is not against them it is against a wrong solution to a worthy problem.

Links:
Arjun rejects relook at quota issue from The Hindu
Quota protests: Private doctors join stir from NDTV
Students:Arjun inciting us from The Asian Age
Arjun rejects re-think on quota from Rediff.com (this has other article to read too)